National science writers 2012

Silver pointed out that conflicts with the police caused the sharpest increases in news coverage of the protests. This is what allowed him to beat all the pollsters in his forecasts in the Democratic primaries in North Carolina and Indianafor example.

For each contest, FiveThirtyEight produced probability distributions and average expected vote shares per both of these models. One approach to this problem was followed by Pollster. Silver, Renard Sexton and Hale Stewart. These include some subscription services, and others from websites that are direct competitors of this one.

He argued that by giving "Mr. Congress elections for the years — House of Representativesand state Governorships. Silver identified Cohen as "my news assistant". Politics is one topic that sometimes data journalism is good at covering. But the near stalemate in Minnesota led to a recount that was settled only on June 30, For national science writers 2012 general election projections for each state, in addition to relying on the available polls in a given state and "similar states," Silver estimated a " regression " using historical voting information along with demographic characteristics of the states to create an estimate that he treated as a separate poll equivalent to the actually available polls from that state.

He posted predictions for the upcoming primaries based not on polling data, but on a statistical model driven mostly by demographic and past vote data Silver expanded the database to more than 4, election polls and developed a model for rating the polls that was more sophisticated than his original rankings.

The model got it right". Special procedures were developed relying on both polls and demographic analysis. Monthly traffic to the site grew steadily from about 2. International affairs columnist Renard Sexton began the series with an analysis of polling leading up to the election; [ 23] then posts by Silver, Andrew Gelman and Sexton analyzed the reported returns and political implications.

Without a model as a fortification, we found ourselves rambling around the countryside like all the other pundit-barbarians, randomly setting fire to things". Furthermore, a basic intuition that Silver drew from his analysis of the Democratic party primary elections was that the voting history of a state or Congressional district provided clues to current voting.

The polling database was compiled from approximately eight or ten distinct data sources, which were disclosed in a comment which I posted shortly after the pollster ratings were released, and which are detailed again at the end of this article.

List of University of California, Berkeley alumni

Each of these models relied initially on a combination of electoral history, demographics, and polling. The site will return to its original URL, www.

However, by applying his own methodology, Silver produced very different results, which suggested that a Conservative victory might have been the most likely outcome. According to the Foundation, "In his posts, former economic analyst and baseball-stats wunderkind Nate Silver explains the presidential race, using the dramatic tension inherent in the run-up to Election Day to drive his narrative.

At the same time, Silver published a brief history of the blog.FiveThirtyEight, sometimes referred to asis a website that focuses on opinion poll analysis, politics, economics, and sports blogging.

The website, which takes its name from the number of electors in the United States electoral college, was founded on March 7,as a polling aggregation website with a blog created by analyst Nate mint-body.com Augustthe blog became a licensed.

This page lists notable alumni and students of the University of California, mint-body.com who also served as faculty are listed in bold font, with degree and year. Notable faculty members are in the article List of UC Berkeley faculty.

FiveThirtyEight Download
National science writers 2012
Rated 5/5 based on 90 review